Potential fixes for 3 code quality findings #19

2026-02-26T11:14:19Z

irammini commented

2026-02-26 11:14:19 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

This PR applies 3/5 suggestions from code quality AI findings. 2 suggestions were skipped to avoid creating conflicts.

_This PR applies 3/5 suggestions from code quality [AI findings](https://github.com/CodeTease/mep/security/quality/ai-findings). 2 suggestions were skipped to avoid creating conflicts._

irammini commented

2026-02-26 11:27:30 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Patch 3 looks pretty good

irammini commented

2026-02-26 11:37:05 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

I'll let iross handle this.

irammini (Migrated from github.com) reviewed

2026-02-26 11:42:37 +00:00

src/prompts/select-range.ts

[PATCH 2]

The parent class (SelectPrompt) does not receive the _key parameter.

This causes a compilation error.

[PATCH 2] The parent class (`SelectPrompt`) does not receive the `_key` parameter. This causes a compilation error.

src/prompts/select-range.ts

					
				@ -103,10 +103,10 @@ export class SelectRangePrompt<V> extends SelectPrompt<V, SelectRangeOptions<V>>

				                }

				                if (this.isSeparator(choice)) {

[PATCH 1]

Declaring interfaces inside loops or display methods like this is a way of writing code that doesn't prioritize the highest priority in TypeScript. Instead of modifying the original data of choice, it's patched up by type casting like NonSeparatorChoice.

The code looks messier and doesn't thoroughly address type safety issues.

[PATCH 1] Declaring interfaces inside loops or display methods like this is a way of writing code that doesn't prioritize the highest priority in TypeScript. Instead of modifying the original data of `choice`, it's patched up by type casting like `NonSeparatorChoice`. The code looks messier and doesn't thoroughly address type safety issues.

Sign in to join this conversation.

No reviewers